Mastodon

Bitcoin Price Watch: Currency Shoots Up to $6,600

At press time, the father of cryptocurrencies has shot up by over $400, and is now trading for $6,650. After many analysts stated that the $5,000 range was imminent, it appears bitcoin has impressed (and surprised) us once again by halting its descent earlier than expected. Whether it shoots back up to the $7,000 range […]

At press time, the father of cryptocurrencies has shot up by over $400, and is now trading for $6,650. After many analysts stated that the $5,000 range was imminent, it appears bitcoin has impressed (and surprised) us once again by halting its descent earlier than expected. Whether it shoots back up to the $7,000 range in the coming days is hard to predict, but for now, investors and traders alike can relax in the short-term, and revel in the idea that bitcoin knows how to pick itself up and move forward.

The currency’s price rose along with Ethereum’s after the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) director of corporate finance William Hinman announced to audiences at the Yahoo Finance All Market Summit in San Francisco that both currencies would not classify as securities due to their decentralized natures, thus making them invulnerable to SEC regulations and laws.

Hinman commented that bitcoin is, and always would be, a commodity, and is thus subject to regulation from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) due to its stance as a “fiat replacing” currency.

The cryptocurrency community praised the decisions, and felt assured in how both bitcoin and ether were meant to be seen and governed. Figures like SEC chairman Jay Clayton have not always been clear regarding which currencies the organization has sought to single out, though bitcoin has always been listed as a commodity. The primary concern lied with Ethereum, and how it would be classified in the future, but a spike for Ethereum has ultimately led to a spike for bitcoin, and traders aren’t complaining.

According to Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, the reason behind the recent bitcoin sell-off is no longer a mystery. The financial analysts recently published a new report explaining that since the launch of CBOE bitcoin futures in December, prices have consistently fallen leading up to their expiration(s).

“Bitcoin sees dramatic price changes around CBOE futures expiration,” Lee explains in the document. “This was something flagged by Justin Saslaw at Raptor Group. We compiled some of the data and this, indeed, seems to be true. Overall, bitcoin has fallen about 18 percent in the ten days prior to CBOE contract expiration.”

He further explains that the CBOE bitcoin futures contract ended last Wednesday, which may have caused prices to hit such a low point.

“A broader observation is there is significant volatility around these expirations,” the document continues. “On average, the price recovered by day six [following expiration].”

One source suggests that the bitcoin drop may be over in the short-term, but that bearish trends could continue to hammer the market in the coming months. It says that one thing investors really need to keep their eyes on is international regulatory maneuvers, which according to finance ministers at the last G20 Summit in March, would arise in July in the form of published recommendations on the issue.

In other words, come July, traders can potentially look forward to solidified decisions regarding how the world – not just individual countries – should examine, monitor and control digital currencies.

Charts by TradingView

Crypto Community Critiques Bitcoin-Tether Manipulation Study

A study published earlier this week by economics professor John M Griffin concluding that the value of Bitcoin has been manipulated via Tether (USDT) has been rejected by portions of the cryptocurrency community, with the criticism that it had clearly not been peer-reviewed. Findings of the study Griffin claims in his research that Bitcoin has been …

The post Crypto Community Critiques Bitcoin-Tether Manipulation Study appeared first on BitcoinNews.com.

A study published earlier this week by economics professor John M Griffin concluding that the value of Bitcoin has been manipulated via Tether (USDT) has been rejected by portions of the cryptocurrency community, with the criticism that it had clearly not been peer-reviewed.

Findings of the study

Griffin claims in his research that Bitcoin has been routinely manipulated by supposedly USD-backed cryptocurrency USDT, while also implicating prominent trading platform Bitfinex. Much of the Bitfiniex management team overlaps with that of Tether, and the exchange site is the main conduit for USDT. In a statement given to Bloomberg, Bitfinex CEO JL van der Velde rejected any accusation of the company’s involvement.

A more detailed look into the findings of the original study was covered by Bitcoin News yesterday.

”Coordinated FUD”

Much of the backlash from the community online rejects it as a coordinated FUD attack, dismissing the analysis as ungrounded pessimism. Twitter user Whalepool, maintaining some 36,700 followers and describing itself as a “community of daytraders focused mainly on Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies”, condemned the study as “a coordinated FUD attack against all of crypto”.

As reported by Finance Magnets, a Reddit user using the pseudonym Priest_of_Satoshi critiqued the study by noting that all it really proves is “people minting Tether are exceedingly good at ‘buying the dip’ and they probably bought about 50% of the dips”. Just like the stock exchange, those trading cryptocurrencies for maximum profits are required to note trends in order to buy and sell appropriately.

Another Twitter user pointed to Griffin’s work at a consulting firm specializing in fraud cases, as well as the fact that the SSRN library where the paper was posted does not require any form of peer-review before publication.

Tether’s actions ”exactly what should happen”

Matt Odell, who is described in his Twitter profile as working in “Bitcoin & distributed systems” with around 13,700 followers, said that the study neither proves price manipulation, nor lack of reserves. The falling price of Bitcoin sees people sell their holdings for USDT, initiating a USDT price rise which prompts Tether to issue more tokens so it again correlates with the price of one USD.

Odell describes Tether’s supply increase during market decline as “exactly what should happen”. He did note in November 2017, however, that the relationship between Bitfinex and Tether had “always been sketchy”, calling Tether “a centralized stop-gap solution until connections to fiat are unnecessary”.

Tether reserves

While Tether may be holding reserve supplies of its tokens in the same way responsible banks are required to, it cannot reveal where its money is held else it would face potential business closure. As some call for Tether to be more transparent in their processes, it is unable to categorically prove such reserves do or do not exist.

 

Follow BitcoinNews.com on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bitcoinnewscom

Telegram Alerts from BitcoinNews.com at https://t.me/bconews

The post Crypto Community Critiques Bitcoin-Tether Manipulation Study appeared first on BitcoinNews.com.

Satoshi’s Place Is Grabbing Everyone’s Attention

The past few days have been riddled with pretty disheartening price movements, as global cryptocurrency markets have declined by 20% since last week. However, these movements are not indicative of the growing progress in the space. If your attention hasn’t been totally consumed by the markets, you likely have heard of one of the newest […]

The past few days have been riddled with pretty disheartening price movements, as global cryptocurrency markets have declined by 20% since last week. However, these movements are not indicative of the growing progress in the space. If your attention hasn’t been totally consumed by the markets, you likely have heard of one of the newest experimental developments, Satoshis.place.

Inspired by Reddit’s April Fool’s Day /r/place and the infamous Million Dollar Homepage, satoshis.place represents a global canvas of 1 million pixels accessible to all. On Satoshi’s Place, users are able to interact with the display, changing any number of pixels to whichever color they prefer. Each pixel costs 1 satoshi to paint, and pixels can be painted over indefinitely. Payments are processed on Bitcoin’s Lightning Network, and there is no limit on the frequency of additions to the painting.

Like other projects from which it derived inspiration, Satoshi’s Place has fostered a certain charm and motley community that have taken a fascination to the experiment. Characterized by lighthearted fun and playful banter, Satoshi’s Place is reminiscent of the welcoming subcommunities that defined cryptocurrency in its formative years, a warm environment that, amid this extended bear trend, could not have come about at a better time.

Early Trends

Like many internet communities, Satoshi’s Place was quickly consumed by an insatiable desire to draw penises. For whatever reason, a dedicated contingent of players have committed their time and satoshis to vandalizing the many different works with phallic objects. Fortunately, there has been a growing counterculture to that trend, and a number of users have taken it upon themselves to paint over the dicks. Opponents to the penis craze are happy to know that the amount of genitalia across Satoshi’s Place continues to dip.

The more prominent battle that has emerged is between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash supporters. Despite the adamant opposition to off-chain scaling solutions (such as Lightning Network) in the Bitcoin Cash community, there has been significant painting of pro-Bitcoin Cash advertisements and images on Satoshi’s Place. Core and Cash supporters are constantly painting over and vandalizing the advertisements of one another.

After just several days, users seem to be creating automated programs to protect and broadcast their artwork. “coinninja.com” has been proudly pasted in several places, and other advertisements seem to regenerate after they are tampered with. The entire board costs just 1 million satoshi, or US$6.5, to cover, so it’ll be interesting to see if certain entities attempt to monopolize the canvas to promote their products or services.

Broader Implications

Satoshi’s Place is massively important as the first Lightning Network application to see broad usage. The thousands of unique impressions on the canvas thus far represent a sort of stress test that confirms that heavy usage of the network does not cripple performance in the same manner that CryptoKitties and other ETH games have affected the Ethereum network.

As Satoshi’s Place continues to grow in popularity, so will the number of individuals who are exposed to and begin to understand the workings of Lightning Network. There are massive implications behind the off-chain scaling solution for the Bitcoin network, and immersive activities like this are a phenomenal way to streamline adoption and expand the capabilities of LN.

AlphaPoint Raises $15 Million In First Major Funding Round

Crypto services company AlphaPoint announced it raised $15 million in its first major round of venture capital funding from Galaxy Digital.

Crypto services company AlphaPoint announced it raised $15 million in its first major round of venture capital funding from Galaxy Digital.

Things I Did… Bitcoin Braces for Bear Market With Feel-Good Tweets – CoinDesk


CoinDesk

Things I Did… Bitcoin Braces for Bear Market With Feel-Good Tweets
CoinDesk
The price of bitcoin (BTC) may be up slightly Wednesday, but that hasn’t exactly raised the spirits of the asset’s most avid investors. Rather, with the market now down roughly 70 percent from 2017’s highs, many HOLDers, the bitcoin faithful who have


CoinDesk

Things I Did... Bitcoin Braces for Bear Market With Feel-Good Tweets
CoinDesk
The price of bitcoin (BTC) may be up slightly Wednesday, but that hasn't exactly raised the spirits of the asset's most avid investors. Rather, with the market now down roughly 70 percent from 2017's highs, many HOLDers, the bitcoin faithful who have ...

Things I Did… Bitcoin Braces for Bear Market With Feel-Good Tweets

Crypto Twitter isn’t letting the prospect of a downturn in prices get them down, rather they’ve turned a bitter price run into a digital kumbaya.

Crypto Twitter isn’t letting the prospect of a downturn in prices get them down, rather they’ve turned a bitter price run into a digital kumbaya.

Chinese Bitcoin Tycoons’ Battle of Words Over BTC 30,000

Chinese entrepreneur Chen Weixing has got himself in hot water after accusing a fellow national “Bitcoin tycoon” of misrepresenting the truth over raising Bitcoin funds, writes Coindesk. Chen, CEO of an app-development firm called Fun City, is a known blockchain enthusiast, having invested in a long list of Chinese blockchain projects, including Qtum and Tron, …

The post Chinese Bitcoin Tycoons’ Battle of Words Over BTC 30,000 appeared first on BitcoinNews.com.

Chinese entrepreneur Chen Weixing has got himself in hot water after accusing a fellow national “Bitcoin tycoon” of misrepresenting the truth over raising Bitcoin funds, writes Coindesk.

Chen, CEO of an app-development firm called Fun City, is a known blockchain enthusiast, having invested in a long list of Chinese blockchain projects, including Qtum and Tron, and exchange operators such as Binance and Huobi, according to Quartz. He made news in 2015 when he announced a ride-sharing project with Yang Jun, co-founder of Chinese group deals app Meituan.

His recent WeChat accusations against Li Xiaolai, a successful Chinese cryptocurrency investor and early Bitcoin mover, have suggested that Li raised BTC 30,000 bitcoins (USD 200 million) in 2013 that was to mature in September 2017, but then changed the deadline to a year later.

Chen alleged that Li had spent the raised funds on a Bitcoin gambling site called Just-Dice, suggesting, “Everyone who’s been in blockchain industry long enough knows this. I’m not lying.”

The crypto community in China has now become embroiled in what is fast becoming a feud between the two Chinese entrepreneurs. Li refused to respond saying that Chen needed to prove his claims.

The latest development in the crypto-feud saw Chen making further allegations that Li lured investors during the bull market in order to liquidate his profits. These accusations lured Li out of hiding, writing an article denying all of the claims:

“Once again, it’s not true. The fund was a private equity ‘equivalent to 20 million yuan (USD 3 million).’ And I never promised to guarantee the fund’s value using Bitcoin. My quote was ‘We hope (this fund) can outrun the Bitcoin market.’ As for the ‘due in September’ part, the fund was set up in a ‘4+1’ model, so it ought to due in September this year. Chen is just muddying the water.”

According to Coindesk, Chen has made a reputation of making inflammatory remarks about other investors. Earlier this year, Zhu Xiaohu, a notable Chinese investor and managing director at GSR Ventures Management shunned WeChat group discussions, because he wanted to “maintain his integrity”.

Chen responded:

“Zhu just wants to die in the old world but I want to live in the new world to come… He doesn’t even care to keep learning. He’s also killing the innovation of a group of passionate young people while pretending to maintain that integrity of his.”

The latest on this crypto ‘Gunfight at the OK Corral’ is that Li is now considering taking legal action against Chen Weixing for defamation of character.

 

Follow BitcoinNews.com on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bitcoinnewscom

Telegram Alerts from BitcoinNews.com at https://t.me/bconews

The post Chinese Bitcoin Tycoons’ Battle of Words Over BTC 30,000 appeared first on BitcoinNews.com.

Clearing Up Misconceptions: This Is How Tether Should (and Does) Work

There is substantial controversy surrounding Tether, a cryptocurrency that claims to be pegged to the U.S. dollar. According to Tether, each Tether token is backed by one U.S. dollar, held in the full reserve of …

Clearing up Misconceptions: This Is How Tether Should and Does Work

There is substantial controversy surrounding Tether, a cryptocurrency that claims to be pegged to the U.S. dollar. According to Tether, each Tether token is backed by one U.S. dollar, held in the full reserve of Tether. But the existence of the U.S. dollars pegging Tether has been called into question. Moreover, worries exist that Bitfinex has been using Tether to the prop up the price of Bitcoin.

Research into Tether shows that misconceptions exist regarding how Tether functions. These misconceptions, in turn, may be contributing in part to the existing controversies. By better understanding how Tether functions, it may be possible to provide some clarity. Analysis of how Tether functions, for example, shows that it is not possible to prop up the price of Bitcoin on Bitfinex through Tether — regardless of whether or not these tokens are backed.

Tether and Bitfinex

Whereas most cryptocurrencies have a finite supply of tokens, Tether does not. According to Tether’s white paper, new Tether tokens can be issued when customers buy tokens by depositing the underlying fiat currency — U.S. dollars or Euros — in Tether’s bank account. However, it is not currently possible to register at Tether; in fact, registrations have been closed since December 2017. During this time, the amount of Tether tokens more than doubled, peaking at 2.5 billion tokens at the time of writing.

For Tether to function as a so-called stablecoin, each Tether token — trading under the ticker USDT — has to be backed by one U.S. dollar. Tether, therefore, needs to hold the underlying fiat of all Tether tokens in their reserve. In their white paper, Tether promised to deliver regular audits to show Tether holds the necessary funds in reserve, but the company has not delivered a complete audit since March 2017. Tether published an audit in September 2017, but the document is an internal memo issued by Friedman LLP, their auditor at the time. No further audit is expected anytime soon as the relationship with Friedman LLP was dissolved in January 2018 and Tether has not yet obtained a new auditor.

The Paradise papers showed that Tether and Bitfinex, one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, are run by the same management team. Bitfinex has been accused of propping up the price of bitcoin through issuing Tether tokens to buy bitcoins. Whenever Bitfinex’s wallet ran out of Tether tokens, new tokens would be issued.

These increases in Tether tokens may be linked to coinciding increases in the price of bitcoin.

In January, a report posted anonymously online showed that the price of bitcoin mostly went up in the hours after new Tether tokens were issued and sent to the Bitfinex wallet. The report furthermore concluded that it is highly unlikely that Tether is growing through any organic business process, but that Tether tokens are printed in response to market movements in order to be used to buy bitcoin and, thereby, increase its price.

In an academic paper published on June 13, 2018, John Griffin and Amin Shams, both associated with the University of Texas, analyzed both Tether and Bitcoin blockchain data to determine whether Tether tokens were issued following market demand or were instead pushed onto the market. Their results suggest that Tether tokens are used to support certain thresholds — a price floor — for bitcoin when prices are falling, stabilizing bitcoin’s price.

Analyzing Tether Issuance

Whenever new Tether tokens are issued, the tokens are sent to the Bitfinex wallet. Tether’s white paper mentions that Tether tokens may be purchased from Bitfinex and that Bitfinex supports the deposit and withdrawal of Tether tokens. Moreover, Tether tokens are always issued and sent to the Bitfinex wallet in round numbers. For example, the latest issuance on May 18, 2018, was exactly 250,000,000 Tether tokens.

These new, large Tether issuances in round numbers moving to Bitfinex have, in part, drawn suspicion. Since Tether registrations are closed and all Tether tokens issued are transferred to Bitfinex’s wallet, the issuance of Tether tokens in round numbers makes it unlikely that these are direct purchases by customers of Tether. Questions have, therefore, been raised asking who could realistically be behind these issuances.

Based on analysis of the issuance and movement of Tether tokens, the answer is that there is currently only one possible customer, in the sense of how the word “customer” is used in Tether’s white paper: Bitfinex.

Instead of buying tokens directly from Tether, Bitfinex’s users can buy Tether tokens on the exchange using U.S. dollars. However, Tether tokens cannot be used to trade on Bitfinex itself. Bitfinex offers Tether as a withdraw-only option to its users. When Bitfinex’s users use Tether as their withdrawal option, they use their U.S. dollar balance on Bitfinex to buy the Tether tokens. Subsequently, withdrawals of Tether tokens from Bitfinex result in a decrease of the Bitfinex wallet’s balance.

When purchasing Tether tokens on Bitfinex, customers are not purchasing them directly from Tether; rather, they are buying from the supply Bitfinex “purchased” earlier as Tether’s “customer.” The issuance of new Tether tokens therefore occurs when Bitfinex runs out of Tether tokens they can sell to their users — when Bitfinex’s wallet runs empty — and purchases new Tether tokens by depositing the underlying fiat in Tether’s bank account. As a result, all Tether tokens in Bitfinex’s wallet are owned by Bitfinex and are available for users to withdraw.

Paolo Ardoino, Bitfinex’s chief technology officer, confirmed in an interview that Bitfinex is a direct customer of Tether and is currently the only gateway in and out of Tether. According to Ardoino, Bitfinex and Tether decided on this change in late 2017 to put less strain on the banks processing Tether purchases. Ardoino added that the company’s plan is to offer more gateways to Tether — suggesting up to 20 — in the near future. To establish these gateways, Tether is expected to hire a new chief compliance officer to oversee Tether’s compliance program, including its due diligence procedures for onboarding new customers.

Whenever Tether tokens are withdrawn from Bitfinex, the tokens are transferred to other cryptocurrency exchanges supporting Tether, such as Binance, Bittrex and Kraken. The Tether tokens on these exchanges are owned by users of those exchanges, not the exchanges themselves, although the exchanges do obtain some tokens through trading fees. Tether is, therefore, a source of liquidity for these exchanges and Bitfinex currently functions as its gateway. For these exchanges, Tether is just another cryptocurrency that their customers bring to the exchanges and trade with. Bittrex and Kraken confirmed that Tether is just like any other token on their exchange, adding that there was no fee involved for listing Tether on either exchange.

Access to Fiat Banking

The implication of Tether tokens only being purchasable at Bitfinex is that the two entities are further intertwined than previously understood: Besides the fact that Tether and Bitfinex are run by the same management team, Tether would not be able to function as it currently is without Bitfinex serving as its gateway to fiat deposits and withdrawals.

For Bitfinex to function as this gateway, however, it needs access to fiat banking itself. In March of 2017, Wells Fargo ended its relationship as a correspondent bank to Bitfinex and Tether. Bitfinex has kept details of its banking relationships a closely guarded secret ever since — a lack of transparency that has further fueled the controversy surrounding Bitfinex and Tether.

On May 24, 2018, Bloomberg reported that Bitfinex and Tether held bank accounts at Noble Bank in Puerto Rico. Furthermore, Bloomberg reported that Bitfinex had partnered with Panama-based financial institution Crypto Capital Corp and used its bank accounts to maintain access to fiat deposits and withdrawals after being cut off by Wells Fargo.

Access to fiat banking is necessary for Bitfinex in order to offer its users U.S. dollar trading. Ardoino confirmed that all balances and USD trading pairs on Bitfinex are in U.S. dollars (USD) instead of in Tether tokens (USDT) and that the dollars and Tether tokens are not mixed together.

Verified Bitfinex users are thus credited with U.S. dollars on Bitfinex when making deposits. Users can use their U.S. dollars when choosing Tether as a withdrawal option. In doing so, they purchase Tether tokens from Bitfinex.

When users instead deposit Tether tokens to Bitfinex, they are similarly credited with U.S. dollars, one U.S. dollar for each Tether token (USDT). Effectively, verified users are redeeming the Tether tokens by selling the tokens back to Bitfinex.

Since Tether is only available as a withdrawal option and cannot be used in trading pairs on Bitfinex, it is, therefore, not possible to prop up the price of bitcoin using Tether tokens on Bitfinex. This conclusion, however, does not disprove the theory that Tether has been used to prop up the price of bitcoin elsewhere. In their previously mentioned paper, Griffin and Shams analyze how Tether tokens are moved to other exchanges and have been used to stabilize the price of bitcoin on these exchanges.

tether chart

Tether’s Price and Peg

Given each Tether token is offered for and credited with one U.S. dollar on Bitfinex, why does the price of Tether show fluctuations? For example, Coinmarketcap and investing.com offer charts that show Tether’s price (USDT) fluctuating around one U.S. dollar. Investing.com explained that their “Tether index” chart is based Kraken’s and EXMO’s USD/USDT trading pairs. Coinmarketcap did not respond to a request to explain what data is used to create their graph.

The price of Tether is not maintained through these trading pairs, however. The price of Tether is guaranteed by Bitfinex offering and crediting each Tether token for one U.S. dollar per token. As long as Bitfinex credits each Tether token with one U.S. dollar, the price of Tether is fixed at one U.S. dollar. Thus, USDT/USD trading pairs may offer insight into how much people trust Tether.

The fact that Bitfinex always values one Tether token at one U.S. dollar probably explains why the USDT/USD trading pairs hardly ever fluctuate far from one U.S. dollar. Whenever the price on the trading pair drops to 98 cents, for example, arbitrage traders — verified on Bitfinex — can buy tokens at 98 cents and deposit them to Bitfinex to be credited one U.S. dollar.

Tether’s Business Model

How does Tether create revenue? Revenue here can be distinguished in two forms: revenue generated by Bitfinex and revenue generated by Tether.

Bitfinex’s function as the gateway to Tether sheds light on how the use of Tether creates revenue for Bitfinex. For other exchanges supporting Tether, Tether is an important source of liquidity as the exchanges do not offer direct fiat withdrawals or deposits. In a way, Bitfinex functions as the fiat withdrawal and deposit gateway for these exchanges, although only for verified users.

To purchase Tether tokens from Bitfinex, users are required to have U.S. dollars deposited to Bitfinex. Similarly, the only location where holders of Tether tokens can redeem their tokens for U.S. dollars is on Bitfinex. For both deposits and withdrawals of U.S. dollars, Bitfinex charges a 0.1 percent fee. To use the Tether withdrawal option on Bitfinex, users are charged $20, regardless of withdrawal size. Deposits of Tether tokens, on the other hand, are free. The revenue created this way is therefore generated on and by Bitfinex, not by Tether itself.

The only source of “revenue” generated by Tether itself is the interest gained on the U.S. dollars held in its reserve. The U.S. dollars backing the Tether tokens are stored in a full reserve bank account, with recent reports suggesting that they are being held at the Noble Bank in Puerto Rico. According to Ardoino, the interest gained on the reserve covers Tether’s expenses while also leaving room to invest in improving Tether’s structure, marketing and compliance program.

Audits

Given Tether’s business model depends on the amount of U.S. dollars held in its reserve, Tether’s “revenue” heavily depends on the existence of all U.S. dollars needed to back the Tether tokens in circulation. Moreover, the model stands or falls on the premise that Bitfinex transfers all U.S. dollars to Tether’s bank account in order to not issue unbacked Tether tokens. Without the existence of the U.S. dollars backing Tether tokens, there is no way to gain interest on those amounts.

In turn, the existence of a full reserve determines whether or not each token should be valued at one dollar; that is, whether all Tether tokens are actually backed by U.S. dollars. If Tether is instead functioning on a fractional reserve, a bank-run on Bitfinex — wherein users deposit back large amounts of Tether tokens at the same time — would crash the price of Tether.

Although recent reporting suggests at least a large amount of the dollars are stored at the Noble Bank, only an independent audit — as promised in Tether’s white paper — can prove that all the U.S. dollars purported to be backing Tether exist.

When asked about the lack of audits, Ardoino acknowledged that an independent audit is needed to prove the existence of the full reserve to the community. “What we want to do is not [audit] the bank balances as of now, but we want to demonstrate to the community that we had the money at the end of every single month, since a reasonable date like January 2017 and on.” He added that talks are ongoing to find a new auditor.

However, this may not be enough to prove Tether was always fully backed. In their paper, Griffin and Shams analyzed whether it is possible that Tether only maintained a full reserve at the end of the month. If true, a coinciding decline of the price of bitcoin could also be expected at the end of each month to create the necessary reserve in U.S. dollars. Their analysis shows that the price of bitcoin did indeed show large declines at the end of every month in which a large amount of new Tether tokens were issued. This correlation seems to suggest that these declines in bitcoin’s price may have been related to Bitfinex’s need to raise reserves at the end of those months.

Although some misconceptions regarding Tether are addressed in this article by analyzing how Tether works, it is likely that the controversy surrounding Tether will continue until Tether and Bitfinex provide full transparency and independent, conclusive audits.

This article originally appeared on Bitcoin Magazine.

WSJ Picks Five Blockchain Firms in Their List of Tech Companies to Watch this Year

The Wall Street Journal has made a list of 25 technology firms to watch this year. It features a total of five different blockchain companies, as well those dedicated to researching cyber security and artificial intelligence. Blockchain Companies Dominate Wall Street Journal List In case you didn’t realise, NewsBTC is all about Bitcoin and blockchain.

The post WSJ Picks Five Blockchain Firms in Their List of Tech Companies to Watch this Year appeared first on NewsBTC.

The Wall Street Journal has made a list of 25 technology firms to watch this year. It features a total of five different blockchain companies, as well those dedicated to researching cyber security and artificial intelligence.

Blockchain Companies Dominate Wall Street Journal List

In case you didn’t realise, NewsBTC is all about Bitcoin and blockchain. For that reason, we’re only going to discuss the WSJ picks that relate to those sectors. You can find the full list of the companies over at the Wall Street Journal’s website though.

#2

Blockstream Corp.

The WSJ’s highest ranked blockchain or cryptocurrency firm was Blockstream Corp. This Montreal start-up was founded in 2014 by a team including Dr. Adam Back, Matt Corallo, and Alexander Fowler. It currently employees a total of 50 staff.

Blockstream Corp. are currently working on the Bitcoin network, trying to develop technology to facilitate micropayments. They’re also looking to create a cryptocurrency data feed with the Intercontinental Exchange.

#6

R3

A company that we recently reported about here at NewsBTC also made the WSJ list. R3 are their number six pick. Last week, there were rumours circulating that they were operating at a loss. However, the company itself deny these reports.

R3 are developing a blockchain-based platform dedicated to facilitating secure transactions between companies and financial institutions. They’re based in New York and were founded in 2015.

#11

Digital Asset Holdings LLC

Another blockchain company that has clearly impressed the staff at the Wall Street Journal is Digital Asset Holdings LLC. Like R3, this New York-based firm has been working on making transactions between financial institutions quick and secure. They’re also working closely with Australia’s biggest stock exchange to revamp their back end.

#12

Brave Software Inc.

Brave were founded in 2015 by Brian Bondy and Brendan Eich. The company currently employs 60 staff and is based in San Francisco.

Brave successfully launched their own privacy-focused browser package last year. They’ve also been working on next generation online advertising solutions with their BAT token. Also exciting is their recent partnership with Dow Jones.

#13

Abra

Abra was founded in 2014 by Bill Barhydt and James D. Robinson. Their California-based company currently employs a 50-strong staff. Abra’s official name is actually Plutus Financial Inc.

Abra have developed a mobile application to help users invest in 25 different digital assets and 50 fiat currencies. The wallet service they provide allows users to track prices and exchange their various currencies.

 

The last time we reported on the Wall Street Journal in connection with the blockchain space was for altogether less positive reasons. Last month, they declared that a massive 271 initial coin offerings (ICOs) exhibited some form of red flag indicating that some form of fraud was occurring. These warning signs included guaranteed risk-free services, insanely high percentage returns, and celebrity endorsements.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

The post WSJ Picks Five Blockchain Firms in Their List of Tech Companies to Watch this Year appeared first on NewsBTC.

What Is APIS Cryptocurrency?

Bitcoin comes laden with a high degree of volatility, which basically means that as time progresses, more regulation will be introduced within the crypto domain. Due to the ever-changing prices of core alt-assets such as ETC and LTC, many people view such currencies as speculative investments. However, with the introduction of masternode investments, ordinary people […]

Bitcoin comes laden with a high degree of volatility, which basically means that as time progresses, more regulation will be introduced within the crypto domain. Due to the ever-changing prices of core alt-assets such as ETC and LTC, many people view such currencies as speculative investments. However, with the introduction of masternode investments, ordinary people can now minimize their overall financial risk while still receiving decent returns.

APIS can be thought of as a masternode mediation platform that enables a wide array of crypto enthusiasts to gain access to a two-tier incentivized network, also known as the Masternode Network.

As readers may know, the term “masternodes” refers to the nodes contained in a crypto network that fulfill a specific function beyond simply relaying transactions. The most striking feature of a masternode is its ability to help investors to acquire stable profits by virtue of simply locking up their holdings in the masternode for a fixed amount of time.

While this may sound like a lucrative proposition, it should be clearly understood that hosting a masternode is out of reach for the average investor since it requires a substantial amount of financial capital and technical prowess.

Overview of the platform

  • While most platforms offering similar services require users to wait until their masternode is fully filled, APIS users have the ability to execute their masternode investments without such delays.
  • The platform does not charge any commision.
  • Users do not have to muster large financial resources or have intricate software engineering skills to make use of APIS.
  • APIS aims to provide investors with a steady income source while minimizing the risk associated with market volatility.
  • According to the company’s roadmap, APIS aims to become the first key currency of masternode coins that ensures complete customer privacy and anonymity.

Key Features

APIS, also sometimes referred to as APIS Core, has been designed atop the Ethereum public blockchain and serves as a masternode mediation platform that aims to help individual and corporate investors utilize their assets with desired masternodes easily and effectively.

The platform can be accessed via a host of digital mediums including PCs, laptops, and smartphones, allowing users to maximize their overall profits while on the move.

Overview of the APIS ecosystem

With many of today’s existing masternode coins such as DASH and MEME, users are required to not only maintain a certain amount of tokens but also to implement them on a Linux server that can be accessed 24 hours a day.

These stringent regulations can present an issue for a lot of people, since casual investors are not that familiar with technical IT operations as well as resolving maintenance problems inherent in hardware management, software updates, and security. APIS lets customers enjoy all of the benefits of masternodes without having to consider the majority of the annoying complications that are bound to arise when an individual deploys an independent masternode.  

The APIS user interface

In terms of the configuration of the platform, all participant wallet information is securely stored on the native blockchain. Moreover, masternode information that has already been incorporated into the system is made accessible to users through a specific API and SDK.

APIS Core manages users’ information and APIS assets, employing an interface which facilitates all of its primary functions. APIS Core is an EVM-based blockchain program that can be deployed in conjunction with other platforms such as Ethereum and Qtum, since it makes use of the widely popular PoS consensus algorithm.

Lastly, to help bolster accessibility and overall usability, the developers of APIS Core have designed the platform to work on a multitude of operating systems such as Windows, Linux, Mac, Android, and iOS.

How it Works

The APIS platform is governed by a special OS which facilitates all transactions in an ordered fashion. For example, when users transfer virtual currencies such as Bitcoin or Ethereum to APIS Core, they receive APIS coins of the same value.

All financial dealings (including conversions) are made possible by a module known as the APIS coinage. Once all investment-related formalities have concluded, investors can receive their rewards in accordance with their share/contribution.

Overview of the APIS operating system

It is also worth noting that around 5% of the interest generated by APIS is donated directly to foundations that are actively involved with blockchain programming and development.

About the team

Ronny Yoo is the CEO of this venture. In addition to his work at APIS, Yoo is also the Co-Developer of FX Financial Engineering as well as a blockchain advisor for companies such as J&J partners.

Daniel Jungmin Lee is the CTO of this project. According to his online bio, Lee has previously been involved with other high-profile organizations like Smardi and has nine patents to his name. He is also the developer of a GUI system that was built in conjunction with NPREPS. 

Finally, Mizusima Ryota is the COO of this company. Prior to joining Oxchild Corp., the parent foundation behind APIS, Mizusima worked at Nomura Research Institute as well as at Chain Team, where he served as the company’s Director of R&D.

Token Details

Since its introduction, APIS’ core token has seen a steady increase in value. While initially sold for US$0.003, the currency has appreciated in value over the course of the past few weeks and is now being exchanged for $0.0077.

APIS token lifetime performance data (courtesy of Coincodex)

As of June 13, APIS has a circulating token supply of 4.41 billion and a market cap of $34.18 million. In all, a total of 9.5 billion coins have been minted.

Final Thoughts

APIS aims to open up a whole new world of investment for crypto enthusiasts by allowing them to deploy masternodes with ease.

If you would like to start investing in this service, APIS trading pairs are currently available on IDEX and Bit-Z.

 

SEC Executive: ‘Cryptocurrencies with Decentralized Structures Not Securities’

SEC Executive: 'Cryptocurrencies With Decentralized Structures Not Securities'The Securities and Exchange Commission’s head of the Division of Corporate Finance, William Hinman, stated during the Yahoo All Markets Summit today in San Francisco that cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH are not securities. Soon after the SEC executive made the statements, cryptocurrency markets saw some gains as BTC rose $350 immediately after the news […]

The post SEC Executive: ‘Cryptocurrencies with Decentralized Structures Not Securities’ appeared first on Bitcoin News.

SEC Executive: 'Cryptocurrencies With Decentralized Structures Not Securities'

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s head of the Division of Corporate Finance, William Hinman, stated during the Yahoo All Markets Summit today in San Francisco that cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH are not securities. Soon after the SEC executive made the statements, cryptocurrency markets saw some gains as BTC rose $350 immediately after the news went public.

Also read: Yahoo! Japan Confirms Entrance Into the Crypto Space

SEC Executive: Decentralized Cryptocurrencies Are Not Securities

The SEC executive who is in charge of overseeing the cryptocurrency and initial coin offering (ICO) landscape, William Hinman, stated today that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin core (BTC) and ethereum (ETH) are not considered securities. Hinman stated that some ICOs may be considered securities but the decision is based off a factor of decentralization.

“Central to determining whether a security is being sold is how it is being sold and the reasonable expectations of purchasers,” Hinman explained at the Yahoo Summit. “This also points the way to when a digital asset transaction may no longer represent a security offering. If the network on which the token or coin is to function is sufficiently decentralized – where purchasers would no longer reasonably expect a person or group to carry out essential managerial or entrepreneurial efforts – the assets may not represent an investment contract.”

Moreover, when the efforts of the third party are no longer a key factor for determining the enterprise’s success, material information asymmetries recede. As a network becomes truly decentralized, the ability to identify an issuer or promoter to make the requisite disclosures becomes difficult, and less meaningful.

Immediately after the announcement, BTC/USD markets spiked well over $350 USD in an hour. Many other cryptocurrency markets like ETH have seen gains as well.

A Digital Asset That Involves a Third Party and Drives the Expectation of a Return Is Likely a Security

Hinman noted that some ICOs tout that they are decentralized and are clearly not while others are obviously fraudulent. The SEC executive further emphasized that he believed networks like BTC and ETH are decentralized which makes them not fit within the definitions of a standard security.   

“Based on my understanding of the present state of Ether, the Ethereum network, and its decentralized structure, current offers and sales of Ether are not securities transactions.”  

Hinman also details some of the main factors people should consider when assessing whether or not a cryptocurrency is a security. “Primarily, consider whether a third party — be it a person, entity or coordinated group of actors — drives the expectation of a return,” Hinman states.  

The Division of Corporate Finance executive concludes that there are exciting legal times ahead and he is pleased to be a part of the process. Hinman’s speech was very positive towards cryptocurrency solutions and blockchain technology adding:

What I believe may be most exciting about distributed ledger technology — that is, the potential to share information, transfer value, and record transactions in a decentralized digital environment. Potential applications include supply chain management, intellectual property rights licensing, stock ownership transfers and countless others.

What do you think of William Hinman’s statements today? Let us know in the comment section below.


Images via Pixabay, Yahoo Finance, and Bitcoin Wisdom. 


Want a comprehensive list of the top 500 cryptocurrencies and see their prices and overall market valuation? Check out Satoshi Pulse for all that hot market action!

The post SEC Executive: ‘Cryptocurrencies with Decentralized Structures Not Securities’ appeared first on Bitcoin News.

SEC Says Bitcoin, Ethereum Not Securities Due to Decentralized Nature

The director of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) division of corporate finance, William Hinman, has announced that Bitcoin and Ethereum will not be regulated securities and are, therefore, not under the jurisdiction of the SEC. This follows an announcement from SEC chief Jay Clayton earlier in June 2018 that Bitcoin was not a security, …

The post SEC Says Bitcoin, Ethereum Not Securities Due to Decentralized Nature appeared first on BitcoinNews.com.

The director of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) division of corporate finance, William Hinman, has announced that Bitcoin and Ethereum will not be regulated securities and are, therefore, not under the jurisdiction of the SEC.

This follows an announcement from SEC chief Jay Clayton earlier in June 2018 that Bitcoin was not a security, making Bitcoin and Ethereum the only cryptocurrencies that have gotten the all-clear from the SEC.

Hinman said in his address at today’s Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum that have become decentralized to the point that no one has control of them will not be considered securities. He added that he was open to adding more cryptocurrencies to the non-securities category after careful analysis.

This is welcome news since it puts most of the money in the cryptocurrency world outside of the SEC’s jurisdiction. Bitcoin and Ethereum have a market cap of USD 113 billion and USD 51 billion respectively as of this writing, 57% of the total cryptocurrency market cap.

Since Bitcoin and Ethereum are outside of SEC jurisdiction, cryptocurrency exchanges will not have to seek SEC approval or licensing to facilitate trading of the top two cryptocurrencies. This will keep the Bitcoin and Ethereum markets more decentralized and increase overall liquidity.

However, the SEC is adamant that it will be regulating most initial coin offerings (ICOs) as securities. Therefore, ICOs must go to the SEC to obtain proper licensing before taking investments or face severe legal consequences.

It further clarifies that what defines a cryptocurrency as a security is if a third party that developed or sponsored the cryptocurrency is making a profit off selling it and if investors expect a return on their investment. Not all ICOs will be considered securities since some offer digital assets that can be considered consumer products, where users don’t expect a return on their investment.

 

Follow BitcoinNews.com on Twitter at https://twitter.com/bitcoinnewscom

Telegram Alerts from BitcoinNews.com at https://t.me/bconews

The post SEC Says Bitcoin, Ethereum Not Securities Due to Decentralized Nature appeared first on BitcoinNews.com.

SEC Director of Corporate Finance: Ether Is Not a Security

In an informal statement made at Yahoo Finance’s All Market Summit: Crypto, William Hinman, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s director of corporate finance, indicated that the regulator…

SEC Director of Corporate Finance: Ether Is Not a Security

In an informal statement made at Yahoo Finance’s All Market Summit: Crypto, William Hinman, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s director of corporate finance, indicated that the regulatory agency has no plans to deem ether a security.

“… based on my understanding of the present state of Ether, the Ethereum network and its decentralized structure, current offers and sales of Ether are not securities transactions,” Hinman said in a speech at the summit.

Along with ether, Hinman stated that the SEC would not classify bitcoin as a security, either. Rather, both cryptocurrencies function similar to commodities like gold, silver or oil, the agency believes.

But not all coins are created equal, Hinman expressed in his speech, and the SEC’s leniency on crypto’s top assets won’t relieve tokens from scrutiny. Tokens and Initial Coin Offerings, he continued, are most likely to be considered securities. The distinction lies in how the asset is offered or sold to the public.

“… strictly speaking, the token — or coin or whatever the digital information packet is called — all by itself is not a security … But the way it is sold — as part of an investment; to non-users; by promoters to develop the enterprise — can be, and, in that context, most often is, a security — because it evidences an investment contract,” Hinman stated.

This analysis seems to prioritize circumstance over semantics when deeming a token’s securities status. Projects will often dance around their token’s nomenclature to avoid self-branding as something that could be seen as a security, but Hinman conveyed that the SEC isn’t fooled by the verbal footwork. He made it clear in his speech that “simply labeling a digital asset a ‘utility token’ does not turn the asset into something that is not a security … the economic substance of the transaction always determines the legal analysis, not the labels.”

Hinman appeared to contradict himself when he dove into an analysis of token sales likely falling under the blanket of securities, only to dismiss ether from this classification. But this absolution comes from “putting aside the fundraising that accompanied the creation of Ether,” he said, as a token or coin can’t be deemed a security if no central organization or company is directing it after launch.

“Can a digital asset originally sold in a securities offering eventually be sold in something other than a security?” he posits, eventually concluding that it cannot. “But what about cases where there is no longer any central enterprise being invested in or where the digital asset is sold only to be used to purchase a good or service available through the network on which it was created? I believe in these cases the answer is a qualified ‘yes.’”

The speech shed substantial clarity on a question that has loomed over the industry for some time: namely, whether or not ether would be ruled as a security. And, while this speech is sure to quell the anxieties of enthusiasts and investors alike, it leaves a gray area open for the SEC to color in its treatment of each individual token and coin under Hinman’s interpretation.

Still, the developments are positive for an industry that, in the context of the United States, has made a slow crawl toward regulatory legitimacy.

“We are glad the SEC agrees with our long held analysis of how securities law applies to decentralized cryptocurrency networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum,” Coin Center Executive Director Jerry Brito said in a statement. “We are thrilled to see it take a strong pro-innovation approach to this nascent technology. With this guidance, the SEC is showing that taking a pro-innovation approach does not have to come at the expense of protecting investors.”

While the words carry weight from one of the SEC’s highest officials, it’s worth noting that they were spoken somewhat informally and may not represent a cohesive message across the SEC’s regulatory staff.

This morning, Valerie Szczepanik, the SEC’s first crypto czar, issued what looks like a caveat on this front, stating in a panel at the summit that individual staffer comments may not be wholly in line with the SEC’s official stance.

This article originally appeared on Bitcoin Magazine.

Bitcoin and ether surge on new SEC ruling – CNBC


CNBC

Bitcoin and ether surge on new SEC ruling
CNBC
Bitcoin and ether surge on new SEC ruling. 2 Hours Ago. CNBC’s Seema Mody reports on investors welcoming news that the SEC won’t regulate bitcoin and ethereum as securities. Watch CNBC Live TV …


CNBC

Bitcoin and ether surge on new SEC ruling
CNBC
Bitcoin and ether surge on new SEC ruling. 2 Hours Ago. CNBC's Seema Mody reports on investors welcoming news that the SEC won't regulate bitcoin and ethereum as securities. Watch CNBC Live TV ...

SEC Rules Ether not a Security, Markets Explode

Whether or not Ether is sanctioned as a currency under US jurisdiction has been a major point of speculation and uncertainty since the SEC first began its more active stance on cryptocurrencies and ICOs. As the Ethereum platform represents one of the first major ICOs, the future of platform rested majorly on the SEC’s interpretation […]

Whether or not Ether is sanctioned as a currency under US jurisdiction has been a major point of speculation and uncertainty since the SEC first began its more active stance on cryptocurrencies and ICOs. As the Ethereum platform represents one of the first major ICOs, the future of platform rested majorly on the SEC’s interpretation of it.

Just hours ago, the SEC ruled that Ether is not a security. William Hinman, head of the Division of Corporation Finance at the SEC, explained that securities are largely determined by the manner in which they are sold and the expectations that sale entails. Because Ether was distributed in a decentralized manner, and contributions were not met with expected returns, ETH, in the eyes of the SEC is not a security. “”If there is a centralized third party, along with purchasers with an expectation of a return, than [sic]it is likely a security. The key here of course being that Ether is decentralized,” said Hinman.

The market instantly responded to this news. Ether immediately reacted with a US$50 gain, from $470 to $520. It currently rests at $515 and seems poised for further growth. Among top 100 coins by market cap on Coinmarketcap, all lie in the green over the past 24 hours. While the 10% ETH climb is substantial, it is being outpaced by 40 coins among the top 100. ICON (ICX) is leading the show with a 22% climb over the past 24 hours.

To maintain SEC compliance, a number of criteria must be met, including a yearly US$1 million license fee to the SEC. As such, essentially all ICOs have elected to simply bar access to US investors or ignore the jurisdiction of the SEC. Of course, as the US is taking an increasingly active stance on crypto, most projects are starting to equate an approach of ignorance to one of suicide. Shipchain’s recent cease-and-desist exemplifies the danger in such a stance.

If Ether were to be labeled as a security, then it would stand to reason that each of the hundreds of ICOs operated through the Ethereum network, as ETH tokens or otherwise, would similarly be labeled as securities. For most ICOs, meeting SEC standards, especially with that yearly US$1 million, would be impossible. And for many that could comply, doing so may seriously cripple their project in the long term. Today’s SEC ruling has, at least for now, protected the longevity of numerous projects.