Mastodon

Nepal Police Arrest Seven Bitcoin Traders Despite Lack of Regulation

TheMerkle Nepal Arrests Bitcoin TradersVery few countries around the world effectively prohibit people from using Bitcoin. That doesn’t mean police can’t and don’t arrest individuals for their involvement in Bitcoin, though. In Nepal, at least seven people were arrested for being involved in cryptocurrency trading operations. It seems these trades were executed “without authorization”. That’s a strange explanation, considering Nepal doesn’t have any active cryptocurrency regulation whatsoever. Nepal Arrests Raise a lot of Questions Being arrested while doing something that is not considered to be illegal will always raise more questions than answers. This is especially true when the activity being performed involves Bitcoin

TheMerkle Nepal Arrests Bitcoin Traders

Very few countries around the world effectively prohibit people from using Bitcoin. That doesn’t mean police can’t and don’t arrest individuals for their involvement in Bitcoin, though. In Nepal, at least seven people were arrested for being involved in cryptocurrency trading operations. It seems these trades were executed “without authorization”. That’s a strange explanation, considering Nepal doesn’t have any active cryptocurrency regulation whatsoever.

Nepal Arrests Raise a lot of Questions

Being arrested while doing something that is not considered to be illegal will always raise more questions than answers. This is especially true when the activity being performed involves Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency. As of right now, Nepal does not have any official regulation prohibiting the use or trading of cryptocurrencies. However, local law enforcement certainly feels otherwise, as they arrested seven individuals for their cryptocurrency trading activities this week.

This certainly begs the question as to why these people were arrested in the first place. According to a local source which contacted us by email, the arrests were made due to trading bitcoins “without authorization”. That is a rather interesting point of view put forth by the Central Investigation Bureau, as consumers in Nepal can’t ask anyone for permission when it comes to dealing with cryptocurrencies whatsoever. Nor should anyone need to do so in the first place.

While it is true a communist government won’t take kindly toward cryptocurrencies, arresting people without a valid reason won’t go over too well either. Regulatory guidelines are currently being worked out by the Nepalese government, but until those are in place, people are still free to do as they like. Or that is how it should be, at least, even though a communist government may have a very different opinion on these matters.

Local press reports indicate that the suspects were arrested in Kathmandu and Chitwan. They are all still in police custody as we speak, but no further information has been revealed as of yet. All of this raises even more questions as to why these people were arrested in the first place. No currency amounts have been specified either, which only adds more fuel to this mystery investigation. It is evident that all suspects face jail time, although the grounds on which such a verdict would be determined remain unclear.

More broadly, it seems things are going from bad to worse in Nepal for Bitcoin users and companies as we speak. The impending regulation will assuredly introduce some changes over the next few months. It is certainly possible the government will crack down on cryptocurrencies as a whole and prohibit this new form of money from being traded altogether. Bitsewa, one of the few exchanges based in the country, has already shut down this week. The Nepalese version of LocalBitcoins isn’t all that popular either, which is somewhat surprising.

It will be interesting to see how the cryptocurrency sector develops in Nepal. Although this is not a major cryptocurrency hub by any stretch of the imagination, any form of regulation could set a dangerous precedent and stifle innovation. Whether or not Bitcoin will be banned altogether remains anybody’s guess for the time being. There are a lot of questions and very few answers right now; that much is certain.

China’s ICO Ban Puts GigaWatt In Unique Territory

China has long been a dominant player on the global Bitcoin map. By 2016 over 90% of Bitcoin’s global trading volume took place there. Moreover, mining operations were in abundance due to China’s cheap electricity. It is no coincidence that Bitmain,…

chess header


China has long been a dominant player on the global Bitcoin map. By 2016 over 90% of Bitcoin’s global trading volume took place there. Moreover, mining operations were in abundance due to China’s cheap electricity. It is no coincidence that Bitmain, the world’s largest Bitcoin mining equipment manufacturer, is a Chinese company.

While China still dominates crypto mining and mining equipment manufacturing, the country’s Bitcoin trading volume has fallen. When regulations led to bans on no-fee trading and restrictions on Chinese Bitcoin exchanges in early 2017, Bitcoin trading volumes in China plummeted. Bitcoin trading activity diverted to countries like Japan.

 

At the beginning of September, China issued a ban on Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), an unregulated cryptocurrency-based crowdfunding practice that attract capital for new startup companies and projects. This regulatory act sent shock waves through the global Bitcoin community.  

 

As part of the ban, authorities requested that ICO participants be refunded for their contributions. Moreover, the People’s Bank of China and China’s central bank demanded that Bitcoin exchanges be closed.


Mining Resilience 

 

As an emerging presence in the global crypto-mining industry, U.S.-based mining solution provider, Giga Watt, stands in unique territory given theses recent developments. Located in America’s Pacific Northwest—in close proximity to a number of power-producing hydroelectric dams—the Giga Watt Project is proving to be North America’s new major crypto mining player.

The Giga Watt Project’s founder and CEO, Dave Carlson, has little concern over China’s ICO ban: “I don’t see the ban having a large impact on Bitcoin. I’m not convinced that ICOs are inherently linked to the ecosystem.”

While Carlson believes that Chinese authorities still see value in the rapid growth of cryptocurrency, he thinks that this value has been trumped by their will for regulatory control. However, China’s regulatory developments haven’t affected the the Giga Watt Project’s strategic direction. “Because there are many other blockchain processing opportunities outside of Bitcoin, it’s not even a blip on our radar,” noted Carlson. He added, “Personally, I predict that ICOs will return to China, but only on their terms.”

In the meantime, Carlson will continue to lead the Giga Watt Project’s aim of building a mining network unlike anything before it. Currently, the project has three operating units, with 2.25 megawatts ready for tokenization. In addition, three of Giga Watt’s state-of-the-art Giga Pods are now complete. Access to Giga Watt services will be allocated to token holders on a first come, first served basis.


Blockchain-based Computing

A key takeaway in Carlson’s response to China’s ICO ban is what he envisions for the future. Bitcoin mining will likely pale in comparison to new forms of blockchain-based computing methods, and Carlson sees this as one way the industry will mature and stabilize. “As Bitcoin’s value rises, the ability for miners to drive difficulty by adding hashpower becomes harder and harder as much more computing is required.” In this matured industry, Carlson anticipates that Bitcoin’s blockchain will be leveraged, pointing to RSK’s smart contract as an example. “I am hopeful that blockchain-based computing will boost revenue and provide new opportunities.”

The post China’s ICO Ban Puts GigaWatt In Unique Territory appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

Why the SegWit2x Fork in November Will Likely Have Minimal Impact on Bitcoin Price

Over the past week, the Bitcoin price has shown strong resilience towards the exit of the Chinese cryptocurrency exchange market and the emergence of the SegWit2x hard fork in November. Earlier this year, a group of 58 companies led by Digital Currency…

Over the past week, the Bitcoin price has shown strong resilience towards the exit of the Chinese cryptocurrency exchange market and the emergence of the SegWit2x hard fork in November. Earlier this year, a group of 58 companies led by Digital Currency Group (DCG) that represent 83.28 percent of hashing power and 20.5 million bitcoin … Continue reading Why the SegWit2x Fork in November Will Likely Have Minimal Impact on Bitcoin Price

The post Why the SegWit2x Fork in November Will Likely Have Minimal Impact on Bitcoin Price appeared first on NEWSBTC.

Mining Gets Real in Underground Soviet Bunker

By literally taking cryptocurrency mining underground, Ice Rock Mining believes it has a model that is a viable investment in a major aspect of the digital currency realm, its mining operations.

By literally taking cryptocurrency mining underground, Ice Rock Mining believes it has a model that is a viable investment in a major aspect of the digital currency realm, its mining operations.

Bitcoin Believer Tommy Lee Creates Five Crypto Indexes to Help Institutional Investors – CoinTelegraph

CoinTelegraphBitcoin Believer Tommy Lee Creates Five Crypto Indexes to Help Institutional InvestorsCoinTelegraphTommy Lee, of Fundstrat, is well regarded on Wall Street for his bearish predictions, but he has been a believer in Bitcoin for sometime. Th…


CoinTelegraph

Bitcoin Believer Tommy Lee Creates Five Crypto Indexes to Help Institutional Investors
CoinTelegraph
Tommy Lee, of Fundstrat, is well regarded on Wall Street for his bearish predictions, but he has been a believer in Bitcoin for sometime. The strategist has now created five different indexes to help traditional Wall Street investors understand the ...

Accenture and BNP Paribas Experiment with Nxt Blockchain Technology

TheMerkle banks NXT BlockchainThe number of different cryptocurrencies coming to market over the years is almost impossible to count. Some of the older altcoins are still around today, although not everyone will remember most of them. Nxt is one of the older currencies in existence, though it is mainly known for its services to developers these days. Specifically, it now allows for more transparent bank transfers, which is of great interest to BNP Paribas and Accenture Spain. Major Banks Appreciate Nxt Technology Anyone who has been involved in cryptocurrency for more than three years will remember the Nxt currency. It was one of the first times we saw a new

TheMerkle banks NXT Blockchain

The number of different cryptocurrencies coming to market over the years is almost impossible to count. Some of the older altcoins are still around today, although not everyone will remember most of them. Nxt is one of the older currencies in existence, though it is mainly known for its services to developers these days. Specifically, it now allows for more transparent bank transfers, which is of great interest to BNP Paribas and Accenture Spain.

Major Banks Appreciate Nxt Technology

Anyone who has been involved in cryptocurrency for more than three years will remember the Nxt currency. It was one of the first times we saw a new cryptocurrency which couldn’t be mined whatsoever. Instead, users had to rely on a type of “staking reward” for keeping their wallets open in the browser. The concept made a lot of sense at the time, and Nxt quickly became one of the leading cryptocurrencies.

Of course, back then, there weren’t thousands of other altcoins and even ERC20 tokens to contend with. More recently, the Nxt developers acknowledged that a change in their business model was called for, which is why the team is now mainly working on new blockchain functionality. Some of their accomplishments over the past few years include a voting mechanism and more transparent international bank transfer functionality.

It is this latter aspect which has multiple banks so excited right now. Both Accenture Spain and BNP Paribas have shown great interest in Nxt blockchain technology over the past few months. More specifically, Accenture Spain is already experimenting with a blockchain-based voting solution. This particular solution allows a vote count to be updated instantly while voters themselves remain fully anonymous. The mix of public and private technology is of great value to financial institutions; that much is certain.

BNP Paribas, on the other hand, is also making use of a blockchain solution based on Nxt. This is being done as a way to reduce limits on sending money or making purchases on a global scale. While the main purpose of this blockchain is to ease the burden among BNP customers, the ultimate goal is to turn the whole thing into a “borderless cash project”. That’s a rather vague description, although it’s obvious the institution aims to improve its position in the world of cross-border transfers.

This sudden interest in Nxt technology is not something people should be ignoring by any means. While neither bank has fully committed to using Nxt blockchain technology exclusively, this is an interesting decision on the part of both companies. After all, there are several dozen blockchain providers out there, and these banks seemingly have latched onto a project with roots deep within the cryptocurrency community itself. It is an interesting development and well worth keeping an eye on.

It is good to see Nxt’s voting feature get some love and attention. Blockchain technology has often been touted as a way to change the voting process as we know it today, yet there are very few tangible projects out there in this regard. Nxt is seen as an industry leader, based on the comments by these world-renowned banks. It is an interesting turn of events, although it remains to be seen whether other financial institutions will follow this lead.

Papyrus Digital Advertising Ecosystem – Blockchain Goes Mainstream with a Durable Model for Transparency, Security, and Fair Play

advertisingWhat’s the internet for? Social media, games, YouTube videos, or your favorite publications? Not quite. The internet is for advertising. It’s advertising that is the blood and fuel and the main sponsor of the development of the web. For instance, take a look at the range of services offered by the tech giant Google: a web browser, a search engine, a mobile OS, an email service and many others—a truly wide selection. Disclosure: This is a Sponsored Article But only a completely naive customer would see it this way— from the perspective of business these are all just various channels

advertising

What’s the internet for? Social media, games, YouTube videos, or your favorite publications? Not quite. The internet is for advertising. It’s advertising that is the blood and fuel and the main sponsor of the development of the web. For instance, take a look at the range of services offered by the tech giant Google: a web browser, a search engine, a mobile OS, an email service and many others—a truly wide selection.

Disclosure: This is a Sponsored Article

But only a completely naive customer would see it this way— from the perspective of business these are all just various channels for collecting data and delivering ads. Of course, Google does have other projects that have nothing to do with selling and delivering ads whatsoever, but the purpose of all of their main products is exactly that.

In 2016, the digital advertising market size was $223.74 billion, and in 2017 the market will grow even more. But the bigger the market, the bigger its problems:

  • the obsolescence and vagueness of user data;
  • users’ eagerness to avoid ads;
  • non-human traffic and other fraudulent activities.

The advertiser might come across obsolete data at the stage of market and target audience analysis. The desire to know everything about the customer has resulted in the accumulation of a vast amount of information that is not necessarily completely accurate. That is especially so when the advertiser uses alternative and unusual sources trying to isolate their target audience out of the overall mix of web users as clearly as possible. Another big problem for the advertiser is the ‘appearance of anonymity’—search engines and advertising platforms provide only the information they consider relevant. Effectively, a certain kind of balance has been established in this market: the advertiser is provided with such an amount of audience data that makes advertising placement potentially profitable and overall attractive, but they don’t get the whole picture, so that their advertising campaign wouldn’t be too efficient, and so that they would spend more money on the campaign. Sure, there are some legal restrictions regarding the use of personal details, but it is just the tip of the iceberg.

Another headache—beleaguering publishers and advertisers alike—is a general level of frustration with advertising. Online media—depending on selling ad spaces as their main income source—became the first victims of the mainstream use of ad blocking software like AdBlock Plus and similar extensions. Depending upon the outlet type, the share of ad blockers’ users varies from a negligible few percent to a scary 50-70 percent. Trade publications—visited by highly tech-savvy users—are hit hardest by this trend. In that respect advertisers find themselves in a vicious cycle: they have to constantly make their ads more aggressive to get through to those who still watch them, which only increases the percent of people who one day tell themselves ‘enough is enough!’ and install an ad blocker.

Advertising is not bad, what it’s been turned into is

Common sense guides us to suppose that advertising per se is not evil. Inappropriate advertising is. But what if there was a reality where the user would only see ads for those products and services that are of interest specifically to him or her and specifically at a given moment?

The user sees only relevant advertising and, therefore, saves time on searching—the product itself goes into the hands of the user. And probably the user learns about some options and solutions that were previously unknown to him and her—and therefore the user wouldn’t search for them, either.

As for advertisers within this ideal scenario, they would radically save their ad spend making the price of their product more competitive or increasing the returns on its sales.

This hypothetical situation makes clear that the true purpose of advertising is not to be an irritating white noise burning businesses’ money and getting on users’ nerves, but to be a navigator in the world of supply and demand. As of now, this scenario cannot be brought to life but we have to work towards it: for the sake of users’ and advertisers’ interests alike. In all, this would benefit everyone, except for the existing giants of the advertising market: to them, billions of dollars burnt by businesses are like sacrifices to ancient gods that were sent by priests to heaven through the smoke of sacred pyres.

But the middleman cannot reign forever. And the alternatives are already there—including the blockchain-based ones, of course; make no mistake—this tool for the digital guarantee of fair play will find its place in the existing ad market permeated by deception.

Papyrus of justice: data should generate profits for those who it belongs to

Papyrus is the world’s first decentralized and highly scalable ecosystem for programmatic advertising capable of processing billions of ad views on a daily basis. This comprehensive system will bring together users, publishers, advertisers, and developers of decentralized applications (dApps) making their interactions efficient, transparent, and mutually beneficial.This ecosystem was created by specialists in the field in order to fix the main issues of the modern digital advertising market:

  • Poor user experience;
  • Lack of data privacy;
  • Unreliable targeting;
  • Lack of transparency;
  • Fraud;
  • High administrative costs.

What is justice in terms of digital advertising? Ad services make fortunes collecting personal user data that create extremely, unsettlingly detailed user profiles—their digital replicas, albeit depersonalized ones.

Back in the day, most target audiences used to be determined by sex-age structure, whereas now advertisers have much more freedom. Web companies constantly collect data through their products, and because of that they know almost everything about you: your age, your marital status, your interests, where you live, what you buy, how you have fun, and even what you are planning to buy. Targeting has become significantly easier thanks to social media and everyone’s carelessness regarding their personal data. But even if you are extremely meticulous and careful with your personal details, there’s still a numbered ‘folder’ on you, maybe not as detailed as on everybody else. And it will also be sold to the advertiser.

But why should your personal data generate profits to some completely outside organizations when the user itself—the object of this cutthroat battle—gets nothing from it, except for annoying and inefficient advertising? If you type in a search engine ‘buy a cupboard’ you will be bombarded by ads about cupboards and other pieces of furniture for the entire week. It is especially frustrating when you’ve already bought the cupboard, but Google doesn’t know about that.

Content-wise, the situation is even worse: apart from the constant barrage of various context banner ads, the user has to watch certain ad videos that, quite possibly, are of no interest to him or her whatsoever. The reasoning behind this boils down to the necessity of monetization and the shifting away from the paid subscription model. But, quite often, due to the depersonalized nature of data the image of the ‘average user’ doesn’t overlap with the interests of a given person. At the end of the day, we have the following situation:

  • Businesses utilize user data under the slogan ‘What’s the big deal?’;
  • Businesses generate profits;
  • Advertisers get a slightly more accurate information and partially reduce their costs;
  • Users get nothing except for scarcely ever relevant banners and ad videos;
  • Data acquisition destroys privacy.

Papyrus’s idea: a blockchain-guaranteed mechanism for the fair interaction between advertisers and users

Advertisers themselves don’t care who the beneficiary of the data they acquire is—Google or John from Glasgow whose digital profile is the most valuable commodity in the digital advertising market.

Papyrus is not just another ad tech platform that is going to integrate into the existing conditions of the digital advertising market; it is a set of technologies that is going to disrupt it.

The uniqueness of Papyrys’s approach is that its participants won’t have to put their trust into intermediaries when dealing with digital advertising: the security and efficiency of the ecosystem will be ensured by blockchain consensus protocols. Papyrus will create the conditions in which advertisers will be much better protected from fraud and will get much higher results for the same amount of money. Economic benefits would amount to billions of dollars globally, and the internet will become comfortable for users because there will be no malicious and fraudulent advertising anymore.

Papyrus against non-human traffic

The damage from AdBlock and other ad blocking software is eclipsed by the volume of non-human traffic and the losses associated with its use.

The term ‘non-human traffic’ refers to bots that mimic the activity of a human user in order to trigger an ad view and get money for it from the ad campaign budget. According to various studies, advertisers lose up to 50% of their budgets due to non-human traffic used by unscrupulous developers and publishers.

That is, 50 cents of every dollar spent in online advertising is wasted by the activity of bots or users who were not supposed to end up on a given page. Yes, we are talking about so-called ‘clickbait’—a practice when unscrupulous websites ‘lure’ real people with false or provocative information in order to drive up the number of views and make a profit out of the scheme. Nowadays, non-human traffic, run by bots, principally affects mobile apps, which further diminishes the already limited efficiency of that type of advertising.

Out of $223 billion—the aforementioned size of the digital advertising market in 2016—almost $112 billion have gone to fill the pockets of the owners of non-human traffic and their clients—in complete accordance with the maxim of the great ad executive David Ogilvy: “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is, I don’t know which half.”

But everybody knows who’s paying—the customer.

Papyrus’s idea: the transparent structure of blockchain will help eradicate non-human traffic and other types of fraud

In a completely transparent system, it will be quite easy to track down any ‘fake’ activity, which will eliminate the risk of any manipulations with traffic, reviews, and other actions affecting ad campaigns. The issue of fraud is far from overblown. The opinion of our team—that it’s necessary to use blockchain in order to fix the issue—is shared by specialists in the field.

The Papyrus Architecture

Papyrus is a first-of-its-kind project which has developed a technology architecture that allows to avoid the well-known scalability issues of blockchain. The scalability of the Papyrus project will allow it to quickly and seamlessly grow up to any volumes in accordance with the demands of the market, processing billions of ad impressions on a daily basis. This comprehensive system will bring together users, publishers, advertisers, and developers of decentralized applications (dApps) making their interactions transparent and mutually beneficial.

Papyrus is built on top of the Ethereum blockchain platform and its smart contracts, a network of state channels and a secure decentralized data storage. The architecture consists of four layers with the components of each of these layers developed as an open-source software. Papyrus will also employ blockchain-based identification and reputation management tools for ecosystem participants as well as a decentralized real-time-bidding (RTB) protocol that will support dApps, instant transactions, and a transparent environment for working with programmatic advertising. And in order to accelerate the market’s adoption of the Papyrus ecosystem it will have special open-source gateways that would be easily integrated into traditional advertising systems thus making them part of Papyrus.

Compensation is guaranteed

Another great idea that the Papyrus developers have come up with is an instant feedback tool allowing the user to adjust the content provided by the advertiser. Ad executives have always dreamt about customers ordering ads for themselves. And this dream might come true if the user is properly motivated—for instance, if he or she is incentivized by a prospect of getting PPR tokens that can be easily changed to fiat money on several cryptoexchanges. These tokens can also be used instead of fiat money for paying for additional services and apps of the Papyrus platform: that kind of internal circulation of coins enriches the project ecosystem and  makes it even stronger.

Payments made with the Papyrus tokens on the Ethereum blockchain simplify the financial interactions between external developers and users: services can be paid for without having to turn to payment gateways or other tools. The project tokens will be sold during the Papyrus launch crowdfunding campaign that starts on October 12. The project plans to collect at least $5 million for the development of the ecosystem, attracting advertisers, and integrations with the existing players of the advertising market.

You can support the idea of properly cleaning up the digital ad market with cryptocurrency on the Papyrus ICO website, starting October 12. And if you want to ask the developers’ team any questions—you can do that right now in their Telegram group channel.

Bitcoin Frightens Governments: John McAfee – CoinTelegraph

CoinTelegraphBitcoin Frightens Governments: John McAfeeCoinTelegraphCyber security expert and Bitcoin backer John McAfee says the only fear that Bitcoin users can have is that governments will act on their own self-involved fear. The technology pioneer…


CoinTelegraph

Bitcoin Frightens Governments: John McAfee
CoinTelegraph
Cyber security expert and Bitcoin backer John McAfee says the only fear that Bitcoin users can have is that governments will act on their own self-involved fear. The technology pioneer says the only hurdle to Bitcoin is governments trying to stop it ...

Malta to Host Blockchain Conference for Entrepreneurs, Startups and Investors

On December 7, St. Julian’s will host the event for all those interested in blockchain and cryptocurrencies in terms of business – Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference Malta. Its participants include entrepreneurs, investors, consultants and IT sp…

On December 7, St. Julian’s will host the event for all those interested in blockchain and cryptocurrencies in terms of business – Blockchain & Bitcoin Conference Malta. Its participants include entrepreneurs, investors, consultants and IT specialists working with blockchain and digital currencies. The event will be attended by representatives of the Government of Malta. At … Continue reading Malta to Host Blockchain Conference for Entrepreneurs, Startups and Investors

The post Malta to Host Blockchain Conference for Entrepreneurs, Startups and Investors appeared first on NEWSBTC.

A Bitcoin Crash Could Really Punish These Stocks – Fortune

FortuneA Bitcoin Crash Could Really Punish These StocksFortuneChipmakers Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices would be likely to see their stock prices suffer if the bitcoin market were to collapse, brokerage TD Ameritrade has said. The question of whethe…


Fortune

A Bitcoin Crash Could Really Punish These Stocks
Fortune
Chipmakers Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices would be likely to see their stock prices suffer if the bitcoin market were to collapse, brokerage TD Ameritrade has said. The question of whether bitcoin is in a bubble or not is one that continues to rage ...

Sources Claim Malaysia Aims to ban Bitcoin by Late December 2017

The concept of banning Bitcoin altogether makes no sense whatsoever. No government or other parties can prohibit people from using something that can’t be controlled or regulated. In Malaysia, that realization will hopefully set in soon enough. A…

The concept of banning Bitcoin altogether makes no sense whatsoever. No government or other parties can prohibit people from using something that can’t be controlled or regulated. In Malaysia, that realization will hopefully set in soon enough. As of right now, the local central bank prepares to issue a nationwide Bitcoin ban before the year … Continue reading Sources Claim Malaysia Aims to ban Bitcoin by Late December 2017

The post Sources Claim Malaysia Aims to ban Bitcoin by Late December 2017 appeared first on NEWSBTC.