Mastodon

Will Bitcoin Tear Itself Apart? – Bloomberg


Bloomberg

Will Bitcoin Tear Itself Apart?
Bloomberg
The notoriously volatile cryptocurrency, whose 160 percent surge this year has captivated everyone from Wall Street bankers to Chinese grandmothers, could be headed for one of its most turbulent stretches yet. Blame the bitcoin civil war. After two
Bitcoin poised for ‘civil war’ over software changesThe Sydney Morning Herald

all 5 news articles »


Bloomberg

Will Bitcoin Tear Itself Apart?
Bloomberg
The notoriously volatile cryptocurrency, whose 160 percent surge this year has captivated everyone from Wall Street bankers to Chinese grandmothers, could be headed for one of its most turbulent stretches yet. Blame the bitcoin civil war. After two ...
Bitcoin poised for 'civil war' over software changesThe Sydney Morning Herald

all 5 news articles »

Publicly Traded Bitcoin Startup BTCS Reveals Plan to Invest in ICOs – CoinDesk

CoinDeskPublicly Traded Bitcoin Startup BTCS Reveals Plan to Invest in ICOsCoinDeskPublicly traded bitcoin startup BTCS is planning to create a portfolio of digital assets, its chief executive told shareholders in a new letter. In the letter, released …


CoinDesk

Publicly Traded Bitcoin Startup BTCS Reveals Plan to Invest in ICOs
CoinDesk
Publicly traded bitcoin startup BTCS is planning to create a portfolio of digital assets, its chief executive told shareholders in a new letter. In the letter, released today, CEO Charles Allen wrote that the firm would invest in initial coin offerings ...

and more »

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Bear Markets Test Crucial Support Levels

Bitcoin Price Analysis

This morning marked another bearish day in the crypto-space as the entire market cap continued its multi-week-long decline. As referenced in a previous BTC-USD price analysis, we have continued to test the neckline of a massive, multi-week-long Head-and-Shoulders reversal pattern. At the time of this article, the market is making its second test of the ascending trendline (marked in yellow).

BTC Macro HS.png

Figure 1: BTC-USD, 6-hr Candles, Gemini, Head-and-Shoulders Pattern

A breakdown of the ascending trendline typically marks a very characteristic, sustained market reversal that, in our case, has a price projection in the upper $1,800 range (see this previous analysis for a detailed breakdown of Head-and-Shoulders price target calculation).

When confirming the Head-and-Shoulders reversal pattern, key support levels on the way down toward its price projection include the following markers:

BTC Macro HS Support Lvls.png

Figure 2: BTC-USD, 6-hr Candles, GDAX, Key Support Levels

  1. A break of the ascending trendline is often initially rejected before continuing its trend downward — hence, the multiple attempts to break the trendline. However, typically, a sustained move below this trendline is very likely to continue downward and test the next two support levels.

  2. The first attempt to complete the right Shoulder/the first attempt at breaking the ascending trendline was rejected in the form of a Double Bottom Reversal (see this previous analysis for details). At the time of this article, we are making a test of the key, pivotal support line that began the Double Bottom Reversal. A breakdown of this support line is one of the first signs that a long-term, sustained bear market is likely.

  3. The initial support line that separated the “Head” from the right “Shoulder” is of specific significance because the high volume shows the failed market attempt to rally off the largest drop in price since the high $2,900s.

When looking at support lines, it’s important to keep in mind that these are not concrete, rigid lines. Rather, they are elastic and should be treated more like “zones” of support, rather than “lines.” One thing to consider when trading the Head-and-Shoulders pattern is that an initial strong move below the neckline is often rejected along a known support line and will lead to a re-test of the neckline from the bottom. A break below the descending trendline support will ultimately become a strong level of resistance. Below are the potential price trajectories should the market decide to break below the descending trendline:

HS Retest.png

Figure 3: BTC-USD, 6-hr Candles, GDAX, Support Line Tests

Summary:

  1. BTC-USD is currently in the process of testing crucial support levels of a Head-and-Shoulders reversal pattern.

  2. Failure to maintain support could have a potential sustained bear market with a price target of approximately $1,800.

Trading and investing in digital assets like bitcoin and ether is highly speculative and comes with many risks. This analysis is for informational purposes and should not be considered investment advice. Statements and financial information on Bitcoin Magazine and BTCMedia related sites do not necessarily reflect the opinion of BTCMedia and should not be construed as an endorsement or recommendation to buy, sell or hold. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.


The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: Bear Markets Test Crucial Support Levels appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

Bitcoin Price Analysis

This morning marked another bearish day in the crypto-space as the entire market cap continued its multi-week-long decline. As referenced in a previous BTC-USD price analysis, we have continued to test the neckline of a massive, multi-week-long Head-and-Shoulders reversal pattern. At the time of this article, the market is making its second test of the ascending trendline (marked in yellow).

BTC Macro HS.png

Figure 1: BTC-USD, 6-hr Candles, Gemini, Head-and-Shoulders Pattern

A breakdown of the ascending trendline typically marks a very characteristic, sustained market reversal that, in our case, has a price projection in the upper $1,800 range (see this previous analysis for a detailed breakdown of Head-and-Shoulders price target calculation).

When confirming the Head-and-Shoulders reversal pattern, key support levels on the way down toward its price projection include the following markers:

BTC Macro HS Support Lvls.png

Figure 2: BTC-USD, 6-hr Candles, GDAX, Key Support Levels

  1. A break of the ascending trendline is often initially rejected before continuing its trend downward — hence, the multiple attempts to break the trendline. However, typically, a sustained move below this trendline is very likely to continue downward and test the next two support levels.

  2. The first attempt to complete the right Shoulder/the first attempt at breaking the ascending trendline was rejected in the form of a Double Bottom Reversal (see this previous analysis for details). At the time of this article, we are making a test of the key, pivotal support line that began the Double Bottom Reversal. A breakdown of this support line is one of the first signs that a long-term, sustained bear market is likely.

  3. The initial support line that separated the “Head” from the right “Shoulder” is of specific significance because the high volume shows the failed market attempt to rally off the largest drop in price since the high $2,900s.

When looking at support lines, it’s important to keep in mind that these are not concrete, rigid lines. Rather, they are elastic and should be treated more like “zones” of support, rather than “lines.” One thing to consider when trading the Head-and-Shoulders pattern is that an initial strong move below the neckline is often rejected along a known support line and will lead to a re-test of the neckline from the bottom. A break below the descending trendline support will ultimately become a strong level of resistance. Below are the potential price trajectories should the market decide to break below the descending trendline:

HS Retest.png

Figure 3: BTC-USD, 6-hr Candles, GDAX, Support Line Tests

Summary:

  1. BTC-USD is currently in the process of testing crucial support levels of a Head-and-Shoulders reversal pattern.

  2. Failure to maintain support could have a potential sustained bear market with a price target of approximately $1,800.

Trading and investing in digital assets like bitcoin and ether is highly speculative and comes with many risks. This analysis is for informational purposes and should not be considered investment advice. Statements and financial information on Bitcoin Magazine and BTCMedia related sites do not necessarily reflect the opinion of BTCMedia and should not be construed as an endorsement or recommendation to buy, sell or hold. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.


The post Bitcoin Price Analysis: Bear Markets Test Crucial Support Levels appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

Content Coin Presents the Benefit of Blockchain Technology to VR/AR Industry

The media and entertainment industry is moving on from print and regular audio-visual media to virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), offering a more immersive experience to the customers. While there is a lot of interest surrounding VR/AR applications, the industry is still in its nascent stages with a majority of the users falling … Continue reading Content Coin Presents the Benefit of Blockchain Technology to VR/AR Industry

The post Content Coin Presents the Benefit of Blockchain Technology to VR/AR Industry appeared first on NEWSBTC.

The media and entertainment industry is moving on from print and regular audio-visual media to virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), offering a more immersive experience to the customers. While there is a lot of interest surrounding VR/AR applications, the industry is still in its nascent stages with a majority of the users falling … Continue reading Content Coin Presents the Benefit of Blockchain Technology to VR/AR Industry

The post Content Coin Presents the Benefit of Blockchain Technology to VR/AR Industry appeared first on NEWSBTC.

Quantum Computers vs Bitcoin – How Worried Should We Be?

TheMerkle_Cryptography Quantum Computing AIOne of the greatest computer innovations everyone seems to be eyeing lately is Quantum Computing. In essence, quantum computing exploits quantum mechanics to perform computational tasks far quicker than a traditional computer can. This means that some aspects of Bitcoin could possibly be vulnerable, but how much do we need to worry? Quantum Computing Might Crack Public-Private Keypairs Research and development into quantum computing is accelerating, and the results are both interesting and worrying. Recently MIT scientists built a 5 atom quantum computer which threatens the very foundations of modern computer cryptography. The scientists behind the project are confident that their

TheMerkle_Cryptography Quantum Computing AI

One of the greatest computer innovations everyone seems to be eyeing lately is Quantum Computing. In essence, quantum computing exploits quantum mechanics to perform computational tasks far quicker than a traditional computer can. This means that some aspects of Bitcoin could possibly be vulnerable, but how much do we need to worry?

Quantum Computing Might Crack Public-Private Keypairs

Research and development into quantum computing is accelerating, and the results are both interesting and worrying. Recently MIT scientists built a 5 atom quantum computer which threatens the very foundations of modern computer cryptography. The scientists behind the project are confident that their computer will put today’s encryption to shame.

This means that public key encryption which keeps much of Bitcoin secure, could be under threat. If a quantum computer was to be large enough and powerful enough, it could drastically reduce the amount of computational effort needed to discover private keys from public keys. As we all know, the moment private keys are compromised then any coins under control of that key are as good as gone.

How Worried Do We Have To Be?

Well, surprisingly we do not need to be cashing out our Bitcoin anytime soon. Even this most recent development in quantum computing is a long way away from a computer large enough to threaten public key encryption. However, once quantum computers are large enough to take public keys on, the Bitcoin community will have already developed and implemented a solution to protect coins and the network.

Right now Bitcoin actually has a little bit of quantum resistance built into it. As long as users are changing addresses with every new transaction -which is obviously recommended- then they mitigate the exposure their private keys to being cracked. The speed with which a quantum computer would need to break that key is insane for now as well. It would have to crack the key up between the time the transaction is signed and when it is packaged into a block. We are a long way from quantum computers working that quickly.

Bitcoin could also implement softfork changes which would update keys to be far more secure and quantum resistant. Currently Lamport signatures are the most favored but do suffer some down sides. They would be incredibly long and have a finite amount of times a transaction can be signed with one key. The latter may help individuals become better with address reuse, but it could be frustrating to some users. Regardless, the likelihood that the Bitcoin community will be able to come up with a solution before the entire network is under attack is pretty high.

Does This Threaten Satoshi’s “Fortune?”

There is an interesting opportunity though that such a softfork would create. The original coins held by Satoshi Nakamoto, if unmoved by the time the network was securing itself against quantum computing, would either be threatened or moved. This means that someone could potentially steal Satoshi’s fortune or force Satoshi to make a move. Either of these things would be huge developments for the Bitcoin community. It would either prove the continued existence of the coin’s god or show that no one is above being robbed.

NewsBTC In Conversation with Marco Streng, Genesis Mining Co-Founder & CEO

NewsBTC: Genesis Mining recently entered the Indian market. How has the response been so far? Marco Streng: Fantastic!   Apart from the fact that India has quickly grown to be a top market for us, we have been very happy to see the volume, maturity, and engagement grow on our Social Media, website & customer … Continue reading NewsBTC In Conversation with Marco Streng, Genesis Mining Co-Founder & CEO

The post NewsBTC In Conversation with Marco Streng, Genesis Mining Co-Founder & CEO appeared first on NEWSBTC.

NewsBTC: Genesis Mining recently entered the Indian market. How has the response been so far? Marco Streng: Fantastic!   Apart from the fact that India has quickly grown to be a top market for us, we have been very happy to see the volume, maturity, and engagement grow on our Social Media, website & customer … Continue reading NewsBTC In Conversation with Marco Streng, Genesis Mining Co-Founder & CEO

The post NewsBTC In Conversation with Marco Streng, Genesis Mining Co-Founder & CEO appeared first on NEWSBTC.

MCAP Labs- A serious step towards standardization of cryptocurrency world

The last few years have witnessed a paradigm shift with the advent of ICOs, funding technology-driven blockchain startups. Their decentralized model of self-financing through community participation has benefitted both the investors and the owners. However, over the past couple of months, we have observed that the absence of any standard process regarding a crowdsale has … Continue reading MCAP Labs- A serious step towards standardization of cryptocurrency world

The post MCAP Labs- A serious step towards standardization of cryptocurrency world appeared first on NEWSBTC.

The last few years have witnessed a paradigm shift with the advent of ICOs, funding technology-driven blockchain startups. Their decentralized model of self-financing through community participation has benefitted both the investors and the owners. However, over the past couple of months, we have observed that the absence of any standard process regarding a crowdsale has … Continue reading MCAP Labs- A serious step towards standardization of cryptocurrency world

The post MCAP Labs- A serious step towards standardization of cryptocurrency world appeared first on NEWSBTC.

NEVERDIE Surpasses $2 Million in Pre-ICO Sale

Some ICOs and Pre-ICOs perform better than others. A revolutionary blockchain based game and virtual world token called NEVERDIE has done well for itself with its ICO and Pre-ICO sale. It has raised over $2,000,000 and it does not show many signs of stopping, since its ICO still has about twenty-one days left to attract new investments. Not All ICOs Are Created Equal We have spoken at length about how many ICOs are just looking to turn a quick buck, or have mediocre Whitepapers. This is not the case with NEVERDIE, which is a completely unique and interesting idea. Investors

Some ICOs and Pre-ICOs perform better than others. A revolutionary blockchain based game and virtual world token called NEVERDIE has done well for itself with its ICO and Pre-ICO sale. It has raised over $2,000,000 and it does not show many signs of stopping, since its ICO still has about twenty-one days left to attract new investments.

Not All ICOs Are Created Equal

We have spoken at length about how many ICOs are just looking to turn a quick buck, or have mediocre Whitepapers. This is not the case with NEVERDIE, which is a completely unique and interesting idea. Investors seem to have agreed and put their Ether into this project.

To date, 8,420 Ether have been raised to support this project during its ICO. This is just over $2 million at the time of writing. About 10 million NEVERDIE coins have been issued and 495,000 Teleport coins have been issued as well. These two coins will provide a complete Ethereum blockchain governance system which will empower players to shape the future of the virtual world and facilitate an amiable relationship between the developers and the players.

Owners of the NEVERDIE tokens have a few things they can utilize them for currently. One is voting. This project is focused on ensuring a democratic space for both players and developers. Token holders can vote on proposals and elections within the virtual worlds.

NEVERDIE coin (NDC) holders also can also start up a Virtual Reality (VR) business with their NDC to create opportunities to earn real cash through gamified jobs. NDC can also be spent to fund new developments in the worlds to create even more VR jobs and earn revenue from those.

Finally, NDC can be exchanged for other cryptocurrencies like how many alt-traders operate today. The Alpha wallet is live so anyone who holds these coins can have quick and easy access to their digital investment.

Coins can be purchased as their ICO is ongoing, but NEVERDIE is also hosting bounties. This is a system that rewards players and individuals for helping spread information about the project via various tasks. One of the “hot bounties” is making a youtube video discussing what NEVERDIE is. Others include following NEVERDIE on social media, sharing news about the project, and adding banners to Twitch streamers’ pages.  All of the bounties will be paid after the completion of the ICO.

The successful raising of over $2 million is due in no small part to the uniqueness of this project. It is a game, it is a cryptocurrency, it is a virtual world, and it is a place where gamified work takes place.

 

Check out the project here: https://neverdie.com/index.html

 

This is a sponsored post and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions or any employees at the Merkle. This is not investment or trading advice, always conduct your own independent research.

Wall Street Expert Predicts Bitcoin Will Reach $55000 in 5 Years – Futurism

FuturismWall Street Expert Predicts Bitcoin Will Reach $55000 in 5 YearsFuturismIn a time of financial instability, many individuals are turning to the decentralized bitcoin to store their wealth. Due to this as well as its potential to revolutionize t…


Futurism

Wall Street Expert Predicts Bitcoin Will Reach $55000 in 5 Years
Futurism
In a time of financial instability, many individuals are turning to the decentralized bitcoin to store their wealth. Due to this as well as its potential to revolutionize the finance system, bitcoin has enjoyed stratospheric growth in recent years.
Tom Lee Feels Bitcoin Can Hit US$55000 per BTC in the Near FuturenewsBTC
Analyst: Bitcoin Could Surge To $55000 In Just Five YearsInvesting.com

all 5 news articles »

What is TargetCoin?

Seeing unique ideas in the sea of ICOs this summer is refreshing, and eye-catching. Anything that attempts to eloquently bring traditional investors into cryptocurrnecies is also particularly worth taking a look at, since traditional investors and traders may bring a large amount of capital into the cryptocurrency market with them. One is called Target Coin, which will allow investors to capitalize on the rise of blockchain technology while generating returns. What is Target Coin (TGTCoin)? TGTCoin is trying to make it easier for traditional investors to come over to cryptocurrencies by helping mitigate the risk and overcoming the technical barriers

Seeing unique ideas in the sea of ICOs this summer is refreshing, and eye-catching. Anything that attempts to eloquently bring traditional investors into cryptocurrnecies is also particularly worth taking a look at, since traditional investors and traders may bring a large amount of capital into the cryptocurrency market with them. One is called Target Coin, which will allow investors to capitalize on the rise of blockchain technology while generating returns.

What is Target Coin (TGTCoin)?

TGTCoin is trying to make it easier for traditional investors to come over to cryptocurrencies by helping mitigate the risk and overcoming the technical barriers to entry which some investors may struggle with. It is only open to new investments during its rounds of ICOs and is a closed-end fund built on smart contracts. Their main goal is to deliver risk adjusted returns to their investors during both highs and lows in the market, while eliminating the most common barriers for traditional investors to participate in the cryptocurerncy markets.

The project issues tokens built on profit-sharing smart contracts. These contracts allow token holders to collect 75% quarterly profits, and an extra 0.75% bonus payout to performance payouts. These bonuses are unique to Target Coin. It is the only cryptocurrency fund in the world to pay out bonuses to its investors. This incentive should be appealing to many investors. 10% of quarterly profits will be reinvested into the fund to grow the project and add more value.

Target Coin also is the first fund ever to use its performance fees to buy back its own coins. This should make investors feel confident in their investments and grow that confidence more over time. Seeing a fund and a project buy back its own coins, not only taking investors money and issuing them, demonstrates the project’s own faith in what they do. When projects are confident in their own product, investors also feel more comfortable.

They also are working on creating something called TARGET-X, which will be an in-house business intelligence system for investors to get the real time data on the portfolio, participate in intelligence briefings, see the trade signals of other investors on the market, and have access to research articles. Access to this level of business and market intelligence can be a game changer for any investor. This is what separates smart positions and moves on the market and literally guessing. Knowledge of the market and of portfolios is the key to success when it comes to investing.

TargetCoin’s website: https://www.tgtcoins.com/

This is a sponsored post. This is not investment or trading advice. Always do your own due diligence and conduct independent research.

Tesla’s Model 3 Is Here

Tesla has made a name for itself with its luxury electric vehicles capable of incredible things. These cars look sleek, are fully electric, are incredibly safe, and can even drive themselves. One historical issue with them is price. However, Tesla’s first affordable model, the Model 3, just rolled off the production line. High-end electric cars are now in the reach of the middle class. Increasingly Affordable Electric Cars One of Tesla’s largest problems before the Model 3 was the sheer cost of its vehicles. Most average Americans were unable to purchase the two vehicles they made. The Model S is a

Tesla has made a name for itself with its luxury electric vehicles capable of incredible things. These cars look sleek, are fully electric, are incredibly safe, and can even drive themselves. One historical issue with them is price. However, Tesla’s first affordable model, the Model 3, just rolled off the production line. High-end electric cars are now in the reach of the middle class.

Increasingly Affordable Electric Cars

One of Tesla’s largest problems before the Model 3 was the sheer cost of its vehicles. Most average Americans were unable to purchase the two vehicles they made. The Model S is a costly $69,200 and the Model X is $83,700. Considering that federal minimum wage puts full time workers at an average of about $15,000 a year, the entire middle to lower class market was unable to be reached by Tesla.

That is changing, and fast. The Tesla Model 3 is targeting the middle class market. This car only costs $35,000. That is just about half as much as the next higher model. If this sort of trend continues -though it would not be halved each time as that is unsustainable-, their next iteration may very well be in the grasp of lower income households as well.

So What Do You Get for $35,000?

Do not let this price tag fool you, this car boasts impressive specs. The Model 3 will be able to go for 215 miles per full charge. To give you some perspective, that means the Model 3 can drive from New York City to Philadelphia and back on one charge. While some combustion engines might get you further on one tank of gas, this range beats any other electric car in its price range.

This is not some weak motor barely capable of going 30 mph. In fact, the Model 3 can go from 0 to 60 mph is under 6 seconds. For a $35,000 car, this is insane. But some of its sports car like performance does not mean its drivers and passengers have to sacrifice space. It can seat 5 people comfortably. The autopilot hardware is also a feature on this vehicle. So if you ever have dreamed of a self driving car but your budget is a bit tight, you might be able to finally get one.

The popularity and hype around this car does mean any new buyers will have to wait though. Currently consumers have to reserve their Tesla Model 3, and delivery of them may be as late as mid 2018. For individuals who have cars that can hold out for at least another year may not see that as too much of an issue, but the literal year long delay can be off putting for many.

With All Electric Cars, We Need to Address the National Grid

Regardless of when consumers finally get their Model 3s, the trend is clear: cheap electric cars are coming and soon everyone will own one. Because of this, I truly think that the US needs to update its electrical grid so that the demand of everyone owning electric cars does not overwhelm the grid. Also the point of electric cars from an environmental point of view is lost when up to 60% of the grid is still powered by fossil fuels.

This Is HODL.voting: Voting With Your Bitcoins but Better

This Is HODL.voting: Voting With Your Bitcoins but Better

Bitcoin’s ongoing scaling debate continues to highlight that protocol governance is one of the biggest challenges for this technology.

One of the many solutions that have been proposed to break through the scaling impasse is coin-voting schemes, where Bitcoin users get to “vote” on potential protocol changes with their bitcoins. One implementation of such a solution, Bitcoinocracy, already exists, while several Bitcoin Core developers have been working on alternative schemes.

And recently, Bitrated CEO Nadav Ivgi developed an early implementation of HODL.voting, a coin-voting solution with an interesting twist. To vote, users need to lock up their bitcoins, losing access to them for some time.

“The theory is that by attaching a real cost to voting — loss of liquidity and ability to sell — we can get more reliable signaling,” the Israeli developer thinks.

Sacrifice

The concept behind existing coin-voting schemes like Bitcoinocracy is simple. Anyone who holds bitcoins can use the associated private keys to sign a message. This message acts as a vote, and all votes are added up. This definitively proves that all votes correspond to the ownership of bitcoins, allowing for a one-coin-one-vote type of system.

But this straightforward setup also has its weaknesses, Ivgi argues. Most important, while this type of voting requires access to bitcoins, it still doesn’t actually cost anything to vote.

“This means that custodians — exchanges, hosted wallets, etcetera — get to have disproportional voting power with their customers’ funds. And I don’t think that people currently holding funds at an exchange meant to consent to the exchange voting on their behalf on matters such as this,” Ivgi explained. “And two: cost-free signaling is not very reliable. Someone who’s not informed on a debate has no incentive not to vote however he feels like, even if he knows that the vote is completely uneducated. Alternatively, it would be very cheap to bribe him to vote a certain way, especially if he’s not planning to vote otherwise.”

The solution to this problem, Ivgi thinks, is to add a cost to voting. Referring to the handicap principle, he suggests that whenever there’s an incentive to cheat, requiring a sort of “sacrifice” can make signaling more reliable. Anyone who wants to vote would have to incur a real cost to prove that he really means it.

The cost that HODL.voting imposes on voters is a lack of access to their actual bitcoins, temporarily. And the longer someone is willing to lose this access, the more weight is attributed to the vote.

“HODL.voting uses time locks as a sacrifice to assign votes with weight,” Ivgi explained. “You send bitcoins to a special Bitcoin address that locks your bitcoins up and encodes your vote. The vote is weighted according to the amount of bitcoins locked, multiplied by the lock duration.”

And this also has the benefit, Ivgi pointed out, that custodians can’t vote for their customers; not without effectively running a fractional reserve. Users may want to withdraw their bitcoins at any time, so making them inaccessible shouldn’t be an option for exchanges and wallet providers.

HODL.voting

Ivgi developed an early implementation of HODL.voting at the Tel Aviv Bitcoin Embassy Hackathon last March — and won first prize with it.

The implementation uses CheckSequenceVerify (CSV), a feature that was added to the Bitcoin protocol about a year ago. CSV allows users to essentially “lock” bitcoins into the Bitcoin blockchain itself. A transaction that spends these bitcoins would be considered valid only at some point in the future, relative to when the bitcoins were “locked up.”

Using the HODL.voting website, voters can create a transaction that locks up their bitcoins with CSV. The website also generates a refund transaction, which will only be valid at some point in the future. HODL.voting users can broadcast this transaction when the time lock has passed — or have it broadcast for them. Consequently, the voter will have lost access to his coins for some time, enforced by the Bitcoin protocol itself.

And the transaction that locks up the bitcoins also contains some extra data: the “vote.” The HODL.voting website recognizes the data as a vote, to record it and add it to all other votes to calculate the overall score. That score is then visible on the HODL.voting website itself.

The only real weakness left is that whoever controls the website could fuzz the visible score. While the actual vote cannot be faked — it’s embedded and enforced by the Bitcoin protocol — what visitors see on the website as the result can be. That said, it should be possible for individual voters to verify whether their vote was included in the overall results. And, any interested party can verify that all the votes as displayed on the website are legitimate. This should keep the platform honest, Ivgi thinks.

Lastly, it should be noted that HODL.voting is, of course, not in any way binding for anything — it’s actually more of a polling mechanism. But as a poll that cannot be faked, it could provide useful information that is otherwise hard to come by.

Ivgi:

“I think that as a voting system it’s mostly interesting for gauging community sentiment regarding Bitcoin protocol development issues. It gives the voting power to long-term holders who’re willing to prove that they’re confident in Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition and that they have a stake in Bitcoin. Not just today, but also in the future value of Bitcoin as affected by the protocol development decisions they’re voting on.”

An alpha version of HODL.voting is currently running on Bitcoin’s testnet. Ivgi says there’s still quite a bit of work to be done before the project will be ready for the mainnet. He will complete HODL.voting if he believes there is enough interest for it.

The post This Is HODL.voting: Voting With Your Bitcoins but Better appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.

This Is HODL.voting: Voting With Your Bitcoins but Better

Bitcoin’s ongoing scaling debate continues to highlight that protocol governance is one of the biggest challenges for this technology.

One of the many solutions that have been proposed to break through the scaling impasse is coin-voting schemes, where Bitcoin users get to “vote” on potential protocol changes with their bitcoins. One implementation of such a solution, Bitcoinocracy, already exists, while several Bitcoin Core developers have been working on alternative schemes.

And recently, Bitrated CEO Nadav Ivgi developed an early implementation of HODL.voting, a coin-voting solution with an interesting twist. To vote, users need to lock up their bitcoins, losing access to them for some time.

“The theory is that by attaching a real cost to voting — loss of liquidity and ability to sell — we can get more reliable signaling,” the Israeli developer thinks.

Sacrifice

The concept behind existing coin-voting schemes like Bitcoinocracy is simple. Anyone who holds bitcoins can use the associated private keys to sign a message. This message acts as a vote, and all votes are added up. This definitively proves that all votes correspond to the ownership of bitcoins, allowing for a one-coin-one-vote type of system.

But this straightforward setup also has its weaknesses, Ivgi argues. Most important, while this type of voting requires access to bitcoins, it still doesn’t actually cost anything to vote.

“This means that custodians — exchanges, hosted wallets, etcetera — get to have disproportional voting power with their customers’ funds. And I don’t think that people currently holding funds at an exchange meant to consent to the exchange voting on their behalf on matters such as this,” Ivgi explained. “And two: cost-free signaling is not very reliable. Someone who’s not informed on a debate has no incentive not to vote however he feels like, even if he knows that the vote is completely uneducated. Alternatively, it would be very cheap to bribe him to vote a certain way, especially if he’s not planning to vote otherwise.”

The solution to this problem, Ivgi thinks, is to add a cost to voting. Referring to the handicap principle, he suggests that whenever there’s an incentive to cheat, requiring a sort of “sacrifice” can make signaling more reliable. Anyone who wants to vote would have to incur a real cost to prove that he really means it.

The cost that HODL.voting imposes on voters is a lack of access to their actual bitcoins, temporarily. And the longer someone is willing to lose this access, the more weight is attributed to the vote.

“HODL.voting uses time locks as a sacrifice to assign votes with weight,” Ivgi explained. “You send bitcoins to a special Bitcoin address that locks your bitcoins up and encodes your vote. The vote is weighted according to the amount of bitcoins locked, multiplied by the lock duration.”

And this also has the benefit, Ivgi pointed out, that custodians can’t vote for their customers; not without effectively running a fractional reserve. Users may want to withdraw their bitcoins at any time, so making them inaccessible shouldn’t be an option for exchanges and wallet providers.

HODL.voting

Ivgi developed an early implementation of HODL.voting at the Tel Aviv Bitcoin Embassy Hackathon last March — and won first prize with it.

The implementation uses CheckSequenceVerify (CSV), a feature that was added to the Bitcoin protocol about a year ago. CSV allows users to essentially “lock” bitcoins into the Bitcoin blockchain itself. A transaction that spends these bitcoins would be considered valid only at some point in the future, relative to when the bitcoins were “locked up.”

Using the HODL.voting website, voters can create a transaction that locks up their bitcoins with CSV. The website also generates a refund transaction, which will only be valid at some point in the future. HODL.voting users can broadcast this transaction when the time lock has passed — or have it broadcast for them. Consequently, the voter will have lost access to his coins for some time, enforced by the Bitcoin protocol itself.

And the transaction that locks up the bitcoins also contains some extra data: the “vote.” The HODL.voting website recognizes the data as a vote, to record it and add it to all other votes to calculate the overall score. That score is then visible on the HODL.voting website itself.

The only real weakness left is that whoever controls the website could fuzz the visible score. While the actual vote cannot be faked — it’s embedded and enforced by the Bitcoin protocol — what visitors see on the website as the result can be. That said, it should be possible for individual voters to verify whether their vote was included in the overall results. And, any interested party can verify that all the votes as displayed on the website are legitimate. This should keep the platform honest, Ivgi thinks.

Lastly, it should be noted that HODL.voting is, of course, not in any way binding for anything — it’s actually more of a polling mechanism. But as a poll that cannot be faked, it could provide useful information that is otherwise hard to come by.

Ivgi:

“I think that as a voting system it’s mostly interesting for gauging community sentiment regarding Bitcoin protocol development issues. It gives the voting power to long-term holders who’re willing to prove that they’re confident in Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition and that they have a stake in Bitcoin. Not just today, but also in the future value of Bitcoin as affected by the protocol development decisions they’re voting on.”

An alpha version of HODL.voting is currently running on Bitcoin’s testnet. Ivgi says there’s still quite a bit of work to be done before the project will be ready for the mainnet. He will complete HODL.voting if he believes there is enough interest for it.

The post This Is HODL.voting: Voting With Your Bitcoins but Better appeared first on Bitcoin Magazine.